🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.